EXCLUSIVE: Obama's $500,000 book bonanza
Deal reached 5 days before he took office
As he empathized with recession-weary Americans, President Obama arranged in the days just before he took office to secure a $500,000 advance for a children's book project, a disclosure report shows.
Analysts say there don't appear to be any rules that would bar such transactions after a president takes office, but it's unclear whether an incoming or sitting president has ever signed a book deal upon entering the White House.
The book deal came on top of nearly $2.5 million in book royalties paid to Mr. Obama last year for "Dreams From My Father" and "The Audacity of Hope," according to the Senate report, which was filed by Robert F. Bauer, who served general counsel to Mr. Obama's presidential campaign.
Yesterday's Headlines: (Cue shimmery fadeout effect and spooky going back in time music)
From a House Ethics investigation report, spurred on by Democrat anger over Newt Gingrich's book deal....from the congressional record. The speaker is Joe Moakley, liberal democrat from South Boston on Dec 22 1995.
Mr Moakley: The Ethics Committee made a very strong statement in their report. I want to take this time to read a section of the ethics committee report, and I quote:
"Existing rules permit a member to reap significant and immediate financial benefits appearing to be based primarily on his or her position."
Mr Moakley: At a minimum, this creates the impression of exploiting one’s office for personal gain. Such a perception is especially troubling when it pertains to the office of the Speaker of the House, a constitutional office requiring the highest standards of ethical behavior.
I guess the loophole today is that while the Office of the President is also a constitutional office, no one today is under the impression that it requires the highest standards of ethical behavior anymore.
3 comments:
ethics and politicians do not go together. thought you knew that by now.
btw, have you been following this jon stewart thing with cnbc? it's hilarious. when he had cramer on the daily show last week stewart really held his feet to the fire. i loved it!
even tho i really don't care for jon stewart, i have followed the abuse he heaped on cramer, who i don't like either. everyone forgets that jon stewart is a comedian...an entertainer who focuses on current events, but i always thought kramer was also just an entertainer focusing on stock markets. anyone who gets news from stewart or stock tips from kramer is getting info from the wrong people.
and i can't believe you have to tell folks that! a lot of people on digg were saying the same thing, just a little more crassly. why can't people just take entertainment as entertainment? movies are movies and not real life...comedians are comedians and not news journalist.
but wait, will the real new journalist please stand up? ;)
Post a Comment